My father worked in development in Tanzania. As a child I learnt about reforestation, the use of indigenous seeds to grow trees (see why are trees important?), sustainable development and I watched as aid organizations spent millions in the area. I personally saw the impact of erosion on communities, roads and cropland. I was raised to appreciate biodiversity, to work towards protecting trees (see tree factsheet), and the environment. I agree with the statement by Norway’s Environment Minister that “cutting down rainforests is not done (by indigenous peoples) for evil reasons” and “there is a need to change economic reality” that makes deforestation a cheap source of fuel.
As a small child, I saw the impact of burning forests to create charcoal, the difficult choice between affordable fuel and the environment. My parents took me to rainforests where I got to see animals found nowhere else in the world. I spent my weekends and holidays in National Parks appreciating the diverse dangerous beauty of nature. This is why I found the UN Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN REDD) side events so interesting. I believe that the preservation of rainforests is crucial in the fight against climate change. There is no way to avoid the reality that deforestation must be reduced. It is encouraging to see that states are engaging with the process and beginning to address practical (and possible) ways to slow down climate change.
Two years ago, Norway launched the International Climate and Forest Initiative. Speaking at a side event at the Forum (more), the Environment Minister (Erik Solheim) mentioned that the next step in the initiative is the Oslo Climate and Forest Conference on the 27th of May. The event is aimed primarily at donor states and rainforest states but all governments and civil society representatives are welcome to attend. He outlined how UN REDD is trying to incorporate existing frameworks into one but stressed that—“politics is local—it may be linked to global processes / principles or influenced by global norms / pressure”. He gave the example of Brazil, where the indigenous peoples, when supported by the law of the land and local government are effective in conservation efforts in their rainforests.
Mr. Erik Solheim mentioned a fundamental paradox in his thinking, which I shared, namely regarding “conditionality”. After seeing the impact of conditionality’s on Tanzania’s ecosystem – I have been staunchly against conditionality on economic aid and policy. Yet when it comes to the rainforest, I take a personal position that advocates for full conditionality on the environment. It has been shown that indigenous forests are more resilient to natural disasters, and to climate change! Our efforts now need to be coordinated, focused and wide scale. National ownership is necessary, benchmarks are needed; planning processes need to be in place and implementation be phased and monitored. This is hard but it is our future.
A different side event organized by the World Bank highlighted the role of Indigenous Peoples in Biodiversity Conservation. Ms. Claudia Sobrevila, Senior Biodiversity Specialist, provided statistics on current World Bank projects, and portfolio mentioning funding instruments such as Global Environment Facility (GEF), and Natural Resource Management (NRM) Projects. She briefly outlined the multiple values of sustainable development from an economic perspective.
Ms. Sobrevila noted that the World Bank is looking into the economic value of bio-diversity and continue to fund projects “focused on terrestrial and marine protected areas , including indigenous land”. She discussed a shift from requests for funding for indigenous to multifocal projects. Multifocal projects incorporate biodiversity, climate change, land degradation and desertification. Her presentation was valuable because it highlighted a shift in funding, increases in community development and showed that there is an increasing focus on “food security”. Out of a total of 596 projects undertaken by the World Bank, 109 support indigenous peoples and only 34 have indigenous people managing funds directly.
Conclusion
It struck me that it is vital to embrace our diversity, to accept the challenge of retaining our differences (our bio-diversity) but to work together to achieve unity, peace and understanding. But more than that, it made me realize that we have to go stop being complacent, and embrace the heritage of the past while creating a sustainable future. We need to continue to develop without causing irrevocable damage to our planet, present and futures.





