" I was five and he was six
It felt so surreal. It is 2010 and I have been attending the first session of the 2012 UN Commission on Sustainable Development's (CSD) Preparatory Committee (PrepCom1).
The 2012 CSD (also referred to as Rio +20 as it is being held 20 years after the Earth Summit that was held in Brazil) is a major deal and it was interesting to watch as the Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) took up both substantive and procedural matters. The procedural side was dealt with in contact groups...and this was why we were sitting here at 7:15 waiting for the final plenary.
It was the final day of the Rio +20 PrepCom and the meeting had been scheduled for 4pm today...but negotiations between member states on contact group 1 ( on the preparatory process) had run over...way over. And I, witnessed my first real UN negotiations despite having attended two UN Commissions.
The 2012 CSD (also referred to as Rio +20 as it is being held 20 years after the Earth Summit that was held in Brazil) is a major deal and it was interesting to watch as the Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) took up both substantive and procedural matters. The procedural side was dealt with in contact groups...and this was why we were sitting here at 7:15 waiting for the final plenary.
It was the final day of the Rio +20 PrepCom and the meeting had been scheduled for 4pm today...but negotiations between member states on contact group 1 ( on the preparatory process) had run over...way over. And I, witnessed my first real UN negotiations despite having attended two UN Commissions.
The negotiations began. The issues arose over paragraph 8 (of a eight paragraph process). The US refused to accept it as it was...and wanted amendments to be made. G77 and China had only accepted it as a "package deal" and once negotiations had begun--they raised the issue of the potential ambiguity of paragraph 3. They felt that the paragraph could be interpreted in a number of ways (most of them wrong) and wanted it amended also. They also didn't accept Switzerland's recommendations for paragraph 8 but preferred the EU's version. I watched Switzerland propose changes, retract the changes to cede to the EUs softer version. I watched the US endorse Switzerland's retracted version and reject the EUs version for being too soft.
Then the negotiations fell apart. The US and the EU agreed, G77 and China did not. The EU and G77 and China agreed...the US did not. This cycle proceeded for hours. The heads of the groups met in small clusters, and then went to convey the wording to the larger groups in bigger clusters
Negotiations complete. Finally, (hours later) a consensus was reached. I found the experience very insightful. I had the unique and unexpected opportunity to talk to the Irish delegation during the "10 minute" negotiation (that in fact lasted over 3 hours).
Negotiations complete. Finally, (hours later) a consensus was reached. I found the experience very insightful. I had the unique and unexpected opportunity to talk to the Irish delegation during the "10 minute" negotiation (that in fact lasted over 3 hours).
----------------------
The prepcom itself was an interesting three days. The main drama seemed center around contact group 2 on draft rules of procedure of UNCSD. Namely, G77 and China raised questions about the involvement of the European Union in the document (because they felt Palestine deserved the same recognition as the EU and refused cede their concerns over the current legal status of the European Union to participate in the document as they did not accept them as replacing the EC---or at least that is what my impression was of the whole situation). There was no agreement on forwarding the document to plenary despite meeting four times (at the third meeting a representative of the Office of Legal Affairs attended to hear the questions regarding the participation of Palestine and the European Union in the participation of the document).
At the fourth meeting of the group, the G77 and China proposed the inclusion of the following questions in the modified text. G77 and China raised a concerns regarding;
- The current legal status and application of paragraph (a) of ECOSOC decision 1995 /201 throughout the whole document; and
- Is there a decision required by ECOSOC to formalise the succession of the EU as a replacement for the EC.
The European Union objected to their inclusion citing ECOSOC decision 1995 /201 and the document PRO/NV/Denomination change--European Union, dated 31st December 2009, mentioning as an example their participation in CSD18.
There was no agreement on forwarding the modified draft rules to the plenary.
-------------------
I really enjoyed the PrepCom Rio +20 meetings. They gave me the opportunity to see the UN at real work. I loved it.
Well, that was UN CSD18 and the Rio +20 PrepCom. Hopefully, I will be at CSD-19. If I am, I promise to keep you updated. If I am not...I promise to be involved online and that should be worth at least one blog entry. I am supposed to be leading the Policy Paper working group to prepare for CSD-19. So, I really need to get myself in gear and start contacting people. I know that I should do it while CSD-18 is still fresh in everyone's minds :)
Well, that was UN CSD18 and the Rio +20 PrepCom. Hopefully, I will be at CSD-19. If I am, I promise to keep you updated. If I am not...I promise to be involved online and that should be worth at least one blog entry. I am supposed to be leading the Policy Paper working group to prepare for CSD-19. So, I really need to get myself in gear and start contacting people. I know that I should do it while CSD-18 is still fresh in everyone's minds :)
























